David Tomb Press . Contemporary Artist . Contemporary Art Work . San Francisco Art . Modern Art Painting . Contemporary Painter . California Modern Art
THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY
David Tomb > contemporary art  > home
David Tomb HomeDavid Tomb PaintingsDavid Tomb Mixed MediaDavid Tomb DrawingsDavid Tomb BioDavid Tomb Press & NewsDavid Tomb BibliographyContact David TombDavid Tomb Exhibitions

By Medium ::

Mixed Media by David Tomb

Drawings by David Tomb

By Title ::

Brent by David Tomb
Buzz by David Tomb
Flag by David Tomb
Larry by David Tomb
Lee Sitting by David Tomb
Mencher by David Tomb
Noah Lang by David Tomb
Paul Wonner by David Tomb
Robert Shimshak by David Tomb

Rogues' Gallery by David Tomb

Skin Deep by David Tomb
Untitled Female Figure by David Tomb

David Tomb ::


Biography > David Tomb

Essays on David Tomb
Press > David Tomb
Exhibitions > David Tomb
Bibliography > David Tomb
Contact > David Tomb

.: San Francisco Chronicle IV
.: San Francisco Chronicle I
.: San Francisco Chronicle II
.: San Francisco Chronicle III
.: SF Weekly
.: Essay by Harry Roche
.: Essay by Bruce Nixon
.: Review: San Francisco Bay Guardian
.: Artweek
.: San Diego Union-Tribune

home l site map l bio l biblio l contact
:: copyright © David Tomb 2004 ::
.: site by ellephant :.

[ PRESS .: SAN FRANCISCO BAY GUARDIAN REVIEW ]


GUARDIAN

The Real Thing
David Tomb's portraits have a hipness quotient of zero

by Harry Roche, San Francisco Bay Guardian

.: David Tomb - Review
San Francisco Bay Guardian

Large numbers of artists fresh out of graduate school nowadays differ
from previous generations in that they seem to have no sense of, or
even remote curiosity about, the history of art--unless it's to float some famous image over their own work in smirking irony. Many operate
under the illusion that nothing worthwhile could have possibly
happened before the advent of Andy Warhol.

Gen Xers who plan to take the art world by storm might note that
virtually every great artist has been familiar with antecedents from
the near and distant past--all the better for tweaking, transforming,
or submerging his or her own milieu. Pablo Picasso was a febrile
sponge who soaked up everything he could lay his eyes on: Greco-Roman
statuary, Japanese prints, African fetishes, the daily news. Warhol,
for his part, rebuffed abstract expressionism's angst-ridden
metaphysical pretensions as he coolly embraced the raw materials of
popular culture.

David Tomb: The Subjective Perception has a hipness quotient of zero.
It also happens to be one of the strongest exhibitions Bay Area
audiences are likely to see this year. At the ripe old age of 36, Tomb
is a contemporary practitioner of that most traditional
genre--portrait painting. Born in Alameda, the painter moved from the
East Bay to New York a few years ago to escape the provincial stigma
that has stopped many Bay Area artists dead in their tracks.

While many artists' 15 minutes expire with the onset of the latest
trend, Tomb has spent the past 15 years assimilating stylistic tropes
from a pantheon of great portrait painters: Jean Dominique Ingres,
Vincent van Gogh, Picasso, John Graham, Willem de Kooning, Francis
Bacon, Alice Neel and Lucien Freud to name a handful. Yet Tomb manages
to meld these disparate influences into something distinctly his own.
His evolving oeuvre might be thought of as an old-new master
palimpsest filled with friends and acquaintances who ricochet across
moldy art history.

An anomaly in some respects, the surrealist-tinged Madison (1997)
nevertheless sets the stage for two dozen paintings and drawings that
follow. Like the faces and figures wedged into smaller claustrophobic
spaces, this park scene is heavy with an existential air. Against a
crepuscular pink sky and a fleshy foreground of silver-blue clots of
pigment, a ghostly figure walks his dog. Schematic trees bend around
him with the same rubber-mask malleability characterizing many of
Tomb's heads. As the artist revels in the pleasures of paint itself,
multidirectional brushstrokes, racked-over surfaces, and variations in
color, texture, and density coalesce into a dynamic visual dialogue
wherein flat/abstract and illusionistic/representational elements are
locked into a tight-knit tension.

Quite apart from their roles as constructive devices, Tomb's
meandering lines and variegated color patches often detach themselves
from a face or figure to take on lives of their own. In the ghostly
charcoal drawing Bukowski (1992), for instance, a seated figure's
snoozing body is defined by a skeleton of thick, black, de
Kooning-esque whiplash gestures writhing atop the paper's white void.
His Baconesque head, meanwhile, remains the most sculptural element
even as it dematerializes into smoky plumes and wispy smears. It's
from this incessant push and pull of compositional shards
simultaneously bound together and torn apart that Tomb's portraits
derive much of the oomph.

On the other end of the color spectrum is the devilishly lurid Outtara
(1996). The slightly dour face of this purple Buddha portrait is a
mask of calm amid Dionysian convulsions of color: lavenders, hot
pinks, grape purples, and pulpy black-and-blue skeins. As Tomb's sober
figure confronts us with a scrutinizing yellow eye and tightly pursed
lips, thick mortarlike swaths streak across his arm and shoulder blade
like the left hook of some blubblegum-brandishing abstract
expressionist. A flaming orange goatee and Medusan dreadlocks that
wriggle on end like charred electrodes amplify the delightfully
infernal atmosphere.

Of all the artists whose presence one senses in the gallery, Freud,
Bacon, and Neel loom largest. This is particularly evident in the
intimate, salon-style ensemble of eight small portraits. The electric
Willie (1996-97) is a cacophony of color. Set against a smoldering
acid yellow-green backdrop, his jigsaw face is a coarse sonata or
hothouse reds, while a dark blue shirt and a starchy white color act
as coolants and counterbalances.

Elsewhere, Bacon's bent noses and flayed features combine with Freud's
meaty butcher-block skeins and Neel's supersaturated hues. Such
portraits are poised halfway between fauvism and German expressionism:
if Tomb, unlike Neel, never fully penetrates the psychic shells of his
sitters or is saddled with her pathos-inducing psychodramas, their
stress lines are nonethless laid bare. By locating his subjects inside
otherwordly color fields loaded with a spiritual charge, Tomb
transforms them into meat-and-potato icons.

Lurking nearby on a more earthly plane is a familiar face in the sea
of strangers. Local art buffs may recognize a mischievous Robert
Johnson (1996). Here the curator in charge of the Achenbach Foundation
for Graphic Arts, clad in a large black cloak, his barely sketched-out
hands folded in front of him, brings to mind a rakish barrister or
recently defroncked member of the clergy.

The bespectacled protagonist of the brooding Fiction (1996), on the
other hand, is reminiscent of a short-lived chapter in German painting
during the 1920s called Die neue sachlichkeit (The new reality). In
this Russian roulette vignette, a solitary figure sits holed up in a
claustrophobic interior holding a cigarette in his left hand and,
apparently contemplating suicide, a revolver in his right. Pregnant
with the possibility that his life may go up in smoke at any moment,
second-hand smoke curls toward the ceiling like carbon monoxide quote
from Van Gogh's Starry Night turned on its side. (As every aspiring
Hollywood scriptwriter knows, the addled Dutchman went out with a
bang.)

The Subjective Perception takes its place alongside the great Alice
Neel show at Mills College a year ago as one of the most exhilarating
portrait exhibitions in recent memory. The original works have a
palpable presence viewers cannot hope to experience through printed
reproductions or cyberspace's pixelated facsimiles. Though portraiture
is passé in some circles, Tomb's paintings and drawings will remain
powerful documents long after Gen X graduates from art school.
-- Harry Roche, San Francisco Bay Guardian

.: The San Francisco Bay Guardian, August 20, 1997